Topics Covered:

Cookies FutureLife’s declaration.

Overview: Statement from FutureLife Website.

Copyright: General – FutureLife Original Material.

Reproduced external Material.

Email and Forum Contributions: Conditions of acceptance.

More General Conditions: Privacy.

Donations.

Legal.

Changes

Cookies:

This website does not place cookies on a visitor’s computer nor invade the operating platform with any covert software. Neither does FutureLife collect visitor’s data to be forwarded on to third party entities. However Futurelife, along with most websites, does use statistical counters to numerate the many thousands of visitors and the various page loads to improve future website performance.

Overview:

The aim of this website is to iterate towards ‘The Truth’, being a bold ideal that will disturb very many individuals who claim to have ‘the truth’ already!

Thus the content on this website consisting of information and opinions may create alarm but only in a genuine attempt to cause people to rationally consider and thus question their own beliefs so that we all together may achieve ‘The Truth’.

However in doing this, it is most certainly not my intention to cause unreasonable distress to any individual, grouping or nationality.

Nor do I desire any person or grouping to use the contents of this website as a misdirected tool to further any malicious action(s) to an individual, grouping or nationality.

This website promotes good neighbourliness and thus attempts to edify all humans on this planet.

Therefore to achieve this high ideal the forthright opinions (of which there are very many, based upon a solid foundation) are directed only at beliefs, concepts or actions of humans but certainly not because of any specific ethnic or cultural origin.

We all have a common ancestral tree and thus we are all part of one family – this website is trying to establish ‘The Common Truth’  as “1st Century Christianity”  for all humans to understand so that we all may know what The Goal in Life is for us.
At present the vast majority of humans are utterly lost and do not know which way to turn for ‘The Truth’.
The various religious leaders around the world being demonstrably ‘spiritually blind’ themselves have thus been acting like charlatans and merely exasperated this problem!

Thus it is with this understanding that information and opinions (with robust foundations) are presented on this website and upon this understanding that emails are accepted.



Copyright:

General.

All material on this website is subject to Copyright Laws governing the reproduction of this material on any media, medium that enables data to be conveyed and/or stored {and simultaneously}/{or any time later} construed as the original understood information.
Any person/grouping/organisation automatically becomes a licensee when using any portion or the whole of this website’s material as described above.

Any material of whatever size may be reproduced by the licensee without seeking prior permission provided all the conditions in this sub-section below are fulfilled:

  1. The full, or part reproduction of the website’s original material may be taken from The Entirety.
    The Entirety is considered limited to an individual downloadable document from off this website.
  2. The Entirety must also be reproduced. The Entirety may be located anywhere within the domain of the licensee’s original and/or compiled material but must be reproduced in the same language of the licensee’s original and/or compiled material located somewhere within easy access of the quoted part on the same media and/or medium necessary to convey the full original information of The Entirety.
  3. The reproduction of any of this website’s material must be used to support ‘the inference’ within the body of the licensee’s original or compiled material domain in which it is being reproduced.
  4. The source of this reproduced website’s material must be clearly stated and obvious to the recipient.
    Stating as the minimum a source reference being made to www.Futurelife.Org

No material may be reproduced, nor parts of it, should any one or more of the conditions in this sub-section below are breached.

  1. Part or all website’s reproduced material used to support any contentious issue that The Entirety by ‘the inference’ opposed.
  2. Any editing or part editing to create a viewpoint or understanding not consistent to ‘the inference’ of the original material being of The Entirety.
  3. Any material maliciously used to ferment anxiety or distress between any human individual/neighbour on this planet against the declared objectives of this website.

Reproduction outside the above conditions will require prior permission first from the editor of www.FutureLife.Org . Please use the email service.

The editor’s decision is final on the above required observances and necessary action deemed as appropriate shall be taken should any of the above conditions be transgressed.

Reproducing externally sourced material.

I will endeavour to make it very obvious that externally sourced material is being used, where it is being used.

This externally sourced material shall be used only to comment upon, to show both the ‘good and/or bad] aspects within any of its assumptions, factual base and/or logical reasoning, conclusions.

All used material would have been publicly available, either from internet, newspapers, radio, television, etc.

I only desire to use the contents of this reproduced material for ‘of its analysis only’, rather than any forthright comments to infer/confer anything upon the person (or organisation) who created the original material. Thus with that understanding I would have strongly desired not to name the source, because it is only the contents of the quoted material that I am desirous to reason upon.

However under English Law of Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 as amended, then under section 30(1) it affords protection only if I fully quote or make known a route to The Source.

Thus though I would have rather allowed the originator some anonymity from any forthright language in analysing their creative work – so that it would have become impossible to personalise the originator with it, but I am forced to expose their name (or a route to disclosing their name) so as to afford myself protection from The Copyright Laws.

Thus I will only do this on the understanding of not to cause personal shame upon the individual because of their demonstrated foolishness – but only to fulfil The Law to defend my necessary action to criticise.



Email contributions and Forum use:

All replies to emails shall be via The Website for The World to reason upon.

The emails are accepted under the following categories:-

  1. To ask a question or seek an explanation to a theological problem.
  2. To seek publishing permission outside the scope given in copyright section.
  3. To enter into a theological debate, contending a theological statement/assumption/conclusion.
    Note all the applicable conditions.
  4. To share new ideas, concepts and expose practised deception within ‘enlightened material’.
  5. Emails of encouragement and support are always welcome!
  6. Section for Miscellaneous (termed “Other”).
  7. New sections may be added in time.

It is expected of the contributor to categorise their email correctly before submission to assist in the sorting process at the reception of it.
If this is not correctly performed then the contributor may assume the email becomes lost and no response will be forthcoming.

If the contributor is a member of any form of grouping, typically religious, political or commercial then the full details must be declared on the email and full details of the source shall be made public on this website.
If it is later discovered that this information has not been disclosed in the email then the editor reserves full rights to act in whatever manner appropriate afterwards.

Correspondence on any contentious issue, judged as such by the editor, then the editor declares the right to publicly expose the material source even if the correspondent has requested anonymity.

However potential ‘whistle-blowers’ who are fearful of peer pressure in reaction to disclosures (practised in all areas of academia) shall be given absolute anonymity on this website. Clearly the material this website enjoys would be the sharing of new ideas, concepts, hypothesises and not personal vendettas hiding behind the protection of anonymity, and as such, ‘personality directed’ emails would not be posted!
Email examples to be posted would be disclosures on the numerous distortions voiced by ‘the majority’ seen as such by ‘a concerned someone’ on ‘the inside’ who knows and yearns for a safe means to speak out, but presently fearful of the repercussions to their future career prospects. This avenue is open for the science and religious communities, but not the political arena. Anything political shall not be posted as being deemed an utter irrelevance to FutureLife’s aims and ideals, worldly politics being far removed from Yahweh;s Desire!

I have signed many NDAs in my life and thus fully respect this precedence of maintaining confidence.

As such I shall be acting under ‘The Code of Practice for a Reporter’ in not disclosing informant identity.

Website response may wait for any number of incoming emails of a specific subject matter to form the basis of a more applicable and comprehensive answer (that may be forthcoming on any part of the website).

The website’s email gate may be ‘closed at any time’ for ‘any period’ appropriate to the need due to ‘forces beyond the editor’s control’ the most likely cause being excessive email communication.

This condition shall be made evident to the visitor before they use the email facilities.

Emails will only be accepted on the basis to assist humans on this planet to iterate to ‘The Truth’.

This will invariably be for questioning, explanations, rational debate, supportive reference material.

What will not be accepted are just personal opinions without a logical argument and/or supportive evidence to substantiate the opinion(s).

This statement is only made through the single reason that millions of emails can be created stating an opinion that would swamp and undermine this website’s constructive aim.

An opinion is worthless by nature (for example stating that ‘the world is flat’), if it is not supported by rigorous reasoning based upon a solid foundation of fact.

Illustrative examples outside this acceptance criteria may be publicised for the stated reasons given at the time.

All rights to form and content will be waived by the contributor upon submission of the email.

Emails selected for the FutureLife Forum will be subject to the editor’s decision, but may not necessarily express the editor’s opinion.

The editor’s decision on all aspects is final and all correspondents accept this statement as being not contestable.

All contributors accept all these terms and conditions as being binding upon themselves when submitting an email to this website.

Without prejudice further conditions of email acceptance and other conditions:

  1. Any private member of the public who makes a contribution may request to remain anonymous. Normally this will be respected – if the content suggests this to be appropriate.
  2. Typical expected format for any contentious issue:
    2.1 Initial entry on the website.
    2.2 First response from outside the website.
    2.3 Website’s first reply to 2.2
    2.4 Last opportunity for correspondent to conclude/resolve their theme/point of view.
    2.5 Website’s final reply to the correspondent’s perceived understanding.
  3. Contentious issues will be rigorously dissected, analysed line by line and results publicised.
  4. Contentious emails will be printed without passing through an editing process, but subjected to (3).
  5. However notwithstanding conditions (3) and (4) any required editing will be declared.
  6. Unfamiliar topics (for example obscure religions) will be thoroughly researched and used in on themselves to demonstrate deficiencies in their logic and/or flawed nature of their foundations during the operation of (3) above.
    I would expect advocates to provide full support material or access to it in the appropriate language to facilitate objective criticism.
  7. Any hindrance in facilitating objective criticism on any contentious issue shall be made public on this website giving full details and history.
  8. External comment of FutureLife and/or of its contents in the media anywhere on this planet will initiate whatever response deemed appropriate to suit the occasion.
    FutureLife may introduce a public affairs response page when the need arises to address these issues.